The 1970s was hockey’s coolest decade. Sudden expansion, new types of player, the arrival of the Europeans, more fighting, great dynasties, great hair, first-time winners, the World Hockey Association. Bobby Orr, Guy Lafleur, Bobby Clarke, Ken Dryden, Paul Henderson. Glorious brawls, glorious goals, drama off the ice and on. The 1970s hold together, as a decade, in the way few others do, with expansion on one end and the post-WHA Gretzky era on the other. The 1970s are their own thing.
Ahead of the scoring explosion of the 1980s, it was an era unusually gifted with great defensemen. Orr, of course; the greatest of them all, the player who half a century later has not even been approached, whose greatness only grows with time, the player who changed the way defensemen could play but also set a standard none of his gifted successors have approached. But there was Brad Park and Denis Potvin and Larry Robinson, there was the start for Ray Bourque and the end for J. C. Tremblay, there was Börje Salming revolutionizing the game in an entirely different way. Though not a low-scoring era, the 1970s may have been the decade of the blueliner. There were plenty of great defensemen between Eddie Shore and Bobby Orr, of course, but people had forgotten that the first person to touch the puck has every opportunity to be as creative as the last. The influence of European hockey was just arriving, and hadn’t had time to influence young players, but the game had already changed, and the ability of the defense to control where the puck went beyond throwing a thundering open-ice hit was being developed and appreciated in new ways.
So let’s look at the best NHL defensemen of the 1970s. Not so much the very best, because nobody needs to be told that Bobby Orr or Larry Robinson was good, but the second tier, the guys who just made the Hall of Fame or didn’t quite, the mass of elite talent who, in an elite era, influenced the game.
To start our conversation, here are the top 20 point shares per 82 games for the decade for all defensemen who played in the 1970s, or to be specific, from 1969–70 to 1979–80.1
| Player | PS | OPS | DPS | OPS/DPS | PS/82GP | From | To | Age | GP | G | A | Pts | +/- | PIM |
| Bobby Orr | 125.8 | 76.5 | 49.4 | 1.55 | 21.36 | 1969-70 | 1978-79 | 21-30 | 483 | 225 | 554 | 779 | 498 | 655 |
| Denis Potvin | 85.9 | 46.5 | 39.4 | 1.18 | 14.14 | 1973-74 | 1979-80 | 20-26 | 498 | 163 | 381 | 544 | 205 | 666 |
| Brad Park | 103.1 | 50.1 | 53 | 0.95 | 12.38 | 1969-70 | 1979-80 | 21-31 | 683 | 154 | 457 | 611 | 347 | 946 |
| Ray Bourque | 11.8 | 4.7 | 7.1 | 0.66 | 12.10 | 1979-80 | 1979-80 | 19 | 80 | 17 | 48 | 65 | 52 | 73 |
| Larry Robinson | 80.4 | 30.2 | 50.2 | 0.60 | 11.57 | 1972-73 | 1979-80 | 21-28 | 570 | 94 | 325 | 419 | 423 | 377 |
| Guy Lapointe | 97.1 | 45.1 | 52 | 0.87 | 11.44 | 1969-70 | 1979-80 | 21-31 | 696 | 164 | 378 | 542 | 355 | 659 |
| Börje Salming | 68.1 | 32 | 36.1 | 0.89 | 10.70 | 1973-74 | 1979-80 | 22-28 | 522 | 97 | 334 | 431 | 182 | 438 |
| Pat Stapleton | 34.1 | 11 | 23.2 | 0.47 | 10.06 | 1969-70 | 1972-73 | 29-32 | 278 | 24 | 141 | 165 | 126 | 119 |
| J.C. Tremblay | 25.4 | 10.4 | 15 | 0.69 | 9.92 | 1969-70 | 1971-72 | 31-33 | 210 | 19 | 122 | 141 | 74 | 54 |
| Serge Savard | 79.8 | 22.4 | 57.4 | 0.39 | 9.39 | 1969-70 | 1979-80 | 24-34 | 697 | 86 | 263 | 349 | 435 | 400 |
| Stefan Persson | 23.9 | 9.6 | 14.3 | 0.67 | 9.03 | 1977-78 | 1979-80 | 23-25 | 217 | 20 | 141 | 161 | 70 | 187 |
| Barry Beck | 23 | 12.9 | 10.1 | 1.28 | 9.02 | 1977-78 | 1979-80 | 20-22 | 209 | 51 | 116 | 167 | -31 | 286 |
| Reed Larson | 26.9 | 15.2 | 11.7 | 1.30 | 8.89 | 1976-77 | 1979-80 | 20-23 | 248 | 59 | 135 | 194 | -39 | 388 |
| Ian Turnbull | 52.1 | 25.6 | 26.5 | 0.97 | 8.75 | 1973-74 | 1979-80 | 20-26 | 488 | 93 | 253 | 346 | 48 | 539 |
| Jacques Laperrière | 31.3 | 6.3 | 25 | 0.25 | 8.70 | 1969-70 | 1973-74 | 28-32 | 295 | 18 | 98 | 116 | 177 | 221 |
| Bill White | 47.2 | 10.3 | 36.9 | 0.28 | 8.51 | 1969-70 | 1975-76 | 30-36 | 455 | 34 | 160 | 194 | 165 | 357 |
| Doug Wilson | 21.3 | 7.6 | 13.7 | 0.55 | 8.48 | 1977-78 | 1979-80 | 20-22 | 206 | 31 | 90 | 121 | 12 | 179 |
| Craig Norwich | 7.1 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 0.69 | 8.32 | 1979-80 | 1979-80 | 24 | 70 | 10 | 35 | 45 | -10 | 36 |
| Gary Sargent | 34.8 | 13.1 | 21.7 | 0.60 | 8.25 | 1975-76 | 1979-80 | 21-25 | 346 | 54 | 143 | 197 | 20 | 214 |
| Jim Schoenfeld | 45 | 8.4 | 36.6 | 0.23 | 7.92 | 1972-73 | 1979-80 | 20-27 | 466 | 34 | 153 | 187 | 198 | 857 |
There’s a sniff test for measuring defensive excellence: is Bobby Orr way ahead in first place? Here, Orr’s 21.36 PS/82GP is near-as-makes-no-difference worth one and a half Denis Potvins (2nd, 14.14 PS/82GP). Nobody reading this needs an introduction to Bobby Orr, but if you’re looking at defensemen and he isn’t the best player in your measurement, go back and fix the measurement until he is. Our top seven are all easy Hockey Hall of Famers. Ray Bourque shows up on the strength of his rookie season alone, but since Ray Bourque was really that good we forgive him. Whitey Stapleton, the next on the list, would not be the worst defenseman in the Hall of Fame if he’d made it. J. C. Tremblay was the rich man’s Whitey Stapleton, and it’s good, or very good, players a long way down.
Point shares, in the era before we had possession numbers, Fenwicks, Corsis, and zone starts, are the best “do everything” statistic I’m aware of2, but as a statistic assembled from other statistics, they are only as good as underlying numbers that we know to be incomplete. They start the conversation but do not finish it. Do we sense a bias towards offensive defensemen? The very top of the list could do everything, but issues appear early. To prefer Potvin to Park or Robinson is a hot take, but not blazing hot. Long-time teammates J. C. Tremblay and Serge Savard are ninth and tenth. I’m not sure Mrs. Tremblay would have taken J. C. Superstar over Serge Savard. Scotty Bowman sure didn’t. Serge Savard is in the Hockey Hall of Fame and J. C. Tremblay is not, though he ought to be. Maybe that’s a sample error; Tremblay played only three seasons in the NHL in our sample before jumping to the WHA, during which he was a first-team All-Star and third and fifth in the Norris voting. We’re comparing three Tremblay seasons of which two were unusually good to eleven years of Savard that included but were not limited to his prime. A little bit of context can put Savard ahead of Tremblay quite ethically, which he probably ought to be.




Enjoyed this? Subscriptions help support future pieces. Support the site