It is unfair, and possibly actionable, to accuse me of quietly stealing article ideas from Twitter replies. Oh, no, I loudly and exuberantly steal ideas from Twitter replies; I dive on them with the frenzy of a pitbull given a steak. So when Andrew Cunningham replied to my first post on the WHA’s superstars suggesting that J. C. Tremblay was not really regarded as the WHA’s best defenseman at all, I at once saw “content.”
My opinion didn’t come from nowhere: Tremblay held the points record at the position and won two best-defenseman awards. But Mr. Cunningham suggested Barry Long, Kevin Morrison, Paul Shmyr, and Lars-Erik Sjöberg were better-regarded in their day than Tremblay. Sjöberg and Shmyr were each named defender of the year once, Long and Morrison were not. Tremblay and Morrison were at their best in the WHA’s earlier seasons; Sjöberg arrived and (apart from one fluke) Long peaked later, and Shmyr was outstanding throughout. Shmyr and Long had decent NHL careers apart from their WHA accomplishments, Tremblay was of course an All-Star, and Morrison and Sjöberg were in the NHL very briefly. Moreover, though Shmyr and Sjöberg were familiar names, Morrison I knew only from a few stories and Long not at all. They were all serious blueliners in the league and anybody who is quoting World Hockey Association facts from personal memory is a jewel to be cherished in 2026; I certainly couldn’t say he is right or wrong.
After all, such personal memories are the stuff history is made of. Statistics are great to fill in the gaps, but they don’t nearly tell everything. The World Hockey Association was, as we have now thoroughly established, major league hockey; yet it is major league hockey which is fading from memory without actually being nearly gone. Grabbing these stray 140-character thoughts, filling them with data, and transforming that into perspective is one of the great joys of life.
The World Hockey Association had more than its share of great characters and astonishing new talents, but day-to-day, most of its players were inevitably more like Barry Long. One of the two best hockey players of the era from Brantford, Ontario, Long put up with a typically protracted early-’70s minor league internship then spent five years in the NHL and five in the WHA. His first two NHL seasons were in Los Angeles, a mediocre team but one that did a decent job of defense-by-committee. Long, while not outstanding, contributed to what success they had. Jumping to the WHA, he had the misfortune of playing with the Edmonton Oilers when they were bad, putting up a frankly unspeakable -49 in 1975–76, worst in the league (second-, third-, and seventh-worst also being Oilers), one of the few worst marks in WHA history1. He was also -47 in his last fairly-full NHL season, though those Winnipeg Jets won nine games and it really wasn’t that bad for such a glue factory of a team. He had stats that stood out for good reasons, too: a 20-goal season and a 10-goal season, and his defensive reputation was solid. He was a member of the 1974 WHA Team Canada (though he did not play), appeared in four All-Star Games, and was twice a second-team All-Star.
Nicknamed “Marathon Man,” Long was known for four things: tirelessness, a big slap shot, blocking other people’s big slap shots, and skating like Bambi on ice. He retired due to a serious hand injury that doctors said was would risk amputation if he played on, but he was 33 by the end, on a lousy team, and minus a million; given the state of his hand it’s probably for the best nobody had to twist his arm to make him hang ’em up. His most notable achievement may be coaching the Winnipeg Jets to their best season ever: in 1984–85 the Marathon Man got a 43-27-10 season and one of two playoff series wins the NHL Jets ever had out of Dale Hawerchuk, Thomas Steen, Dave Babych, Paul MacLean, and 20-odd guys it’s better not to think about. The next year the Jets started 19-41-6; Long was fired and never coached again.
Here are Long’s career major league statistics, the WHA numbers are adjusted to match the NHL scoring level for that season as described earlier, which to remind you are indicated in italics.
| Barry Long | |||||||
| Season | Team | League | Age | GP | G | A | Pts |
| 1972–73 | Los Angeles | NHL | 24 | 70 | 2 | 13 | 15 |
| 1973–74 | Los Angeles | NHL | 25 | 60 | 3 | 19 | 22 |
| 1974–75 | Edmonton | WHA | 26 | 78 | 19 | 37 | 56 |
| 1975–76 | Edmonton | WHA | 27 | 78 | 9 | 29 | 38 |
| 1976–77 | Edmonton | WHA | 28 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 1976–77 | Winnipeg | WHA | 28 | 71 | 8 | 34 | 42 |
| 1977–78 | Winnipeg | WHA | 29 | 78 | 6 | 20 | 26 |
| 1978–79 | Winnipeg | WHA | 30 | 80 | 5 | 34 | 39 |
| 1979–80 | Detroit | NHL | 31 | 80 | 0 | 17 | 17 |
| 1980–81 | Winnipeg | NHL | 32 | 65 | 6 | 17 | 23 |
| 1981–82 | Winnipeg | NHL | 33 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
It is difficult to paint Long as the best WHA defenseman, but he was a more-than-decent player, a minor star. He was only really “physical enough,” and even as a WHA All-Star had a modest opinion of his own powers: he credited his minor league stint in Portland with teaching him how to actually carry the puck out of his own zone2. He was the best defenseman on the Oilers when they were awful, but not dramatically so; scoring 20 goals doubled both his next-best season and his career shooting percentage3. In Winnipeg he was seldom the best defenseman they had, though he was a regular and helped them win. His finest hour was probably with the 1978–79 Jets. Anders Hedberg and Ulf Nilsson were on Broadway, Bobby Hull and Sjöberg were hurt almost all year, but Long carried the mail on the blueline and seems to have been respectable, then when Sjöberg returned for the playoffs it was enough to claim the last WHA championship over some other Brantford kid and the Edmonton Oilers. Those Jets were the second-worst defensive team in the World Hockey Association, and it was the scoring depth that carried them through, but Long did his bit. He reminds me of Eric Brewer: bigger guy for the era but not particularly physical (while not exactly soft), could log serious minutes, offensive gifts not really as impactful as it seemed they ought to be, a poor number one D but a good number two or three, took a star turn here and there but mostly just played the game well. Brewer looked better on his feet though.




