Skip to content

Ongoing series

The Great NHL Defensemen of the 1960s

Earlier this summer I saw Bard on the Beach's production of Antigone. It was very good, with one quirk. The language was mostly respectable modern pseudo-epic: while not authentic it tried to sound ancient and tragic, except for when it didn't. Antigone would have some poignant speech, and Creon would look at her and say "are you fucking kidding me?", and the crowd would laugh and my brain would shift from fifth to second without a clutch and leave a stream of engine parts and motor oil on the highway of dramatic appreciation.

The NHL's defensemen in the 1960s were a lot like that.

It was the last decade of the Classical Tragic Defenseman. Tim Horton. Doug Harvey. Allan Stanley. Red Kelly. Marcel Pronovost. They were excellent players, too excellent to make one type—Pronovost was almost, but not quite, modern—but part of an extended family. Most of them only kinda skate, most of them could drink, those who couldn't drink thought they could, they all had some just obscene weakness. Horton, maybe the best defenseman of the decade, couldn't see. Harvey, whose best decade was the '50s but was still good in the '60s, was an actual alcoholic, not merely a hard-drinking hockey player. Pronovost's body was made up of so much scar tissue that he couldn't move. Yet the league's standard of defense was such that not only did they all play until they were a billion years old but they played well. The 1967 Maple Leafs were called the "Over the Hill Gang" because Lester Pearson may have passed the Canada Pension Plan as a subsidy for their blue line. And you probably remember how the 1967 Maple Leafs did. It wasn't just that these guys were incredibly old, it's that it was good to be incredibly old.

Then, right at the end of the decade, you see Bobby Orr and Brad Park, who changed everything, standing out in history like an F-bomb in the middle of Sophocles. Well, actually, to be more strictly accurate, you have Pierre Pilote, who perhaps was to Orr what Sophocles was to Shakespeare, the man who seemed like a one-off until he wasn't.

Continue reading

How Good Was the WHA: The Subjective Factor

The World Hockey Association was major league-quality hockey when you look back at its best players and the overall quality of its teams, as well as the finest defensemen in a very forward-first league. A major league is defined by having players who can star in other major leagues, and teams that could compete with those in other major leagues; both boxes the WHA has already been shown to check.

We have not yet, however, explicitly looked at the ordinary WHA players who didn't earn as much money as Bobby Hull but added up to far more ice time. Such players were not the key factor on the ice or in history, but hockey is a team game and not even Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl win on their own. Depth players matte and, to quote myself quoting Bill James, as he discussed baseball's Union Association, traditionally but unworthily considered a major league:

The Union Association had big-league players. James counted 272 players who played at least once in the UA; 179 of them either had no other major league experience or mere cups-of-coffee, there were 53 otherwise-fringe major leaguers, 26 players who had been or would be major-leaguers but were either too old or too young at the time, 14 “legitimate major league players,” and, for James, zero stars. The WHA did have NHL stars; besides Hull and Tremblay, Gerry Cheevers, Bernie Parent, Derek Sanderson, and Paul Henderson played in the WHA in their prime. But several major-leaguers, in both the UA and WHA, put up numbers way above their otherwise-established level, while no established pros that James could found particularly disappointed in the UA and few did so in the WHA. As James put it:

Doesn’t it seem pretty obvious what the level of competition in that league was? It was a league that made .270 hitters into .400 hitters, and .450 pitchers into Sandy Koufax. In modern baseball, Al Martin is a career .280 hitter. Let me ask you: if there was a new league now, and if Al Martin hit .400 in that league, and Donovan Osborne went 23–4, would you accept that as a major league?

285 men played 150 games or more in the World Hockey Association, which adds up to two or three seasons as a regular in a league that lasted seven. Of those 285 players, how many of them were playing at an NHL standard during their WHA careers? The best way to find out would be to play hockey history over again in a control universe where the WHA never existed, but that is beyond the scope of this post, so we have to hit the encyclopedias instead.

Continue reading

The Great NHL Defensemen of the 1970s

The 1970s was hockey's coolest decade. Sudden expansion, new types of player, the arrival of the Europeans, more fighting, great dynasties, great hair, first-time winners, the World Hockey Association. Bobby Orr, Guy Lafleur, Bobby Clarke, Ken Dryden, Paul Henderson. Glorious brawls, glorious goals, drama off the ice and on. The 1970s hold together, as a decade, in the way few others do, with expansion on one end and the post-WHA Gretzky era on the other. The 1970s are their own thing.

Ahead of the scoring explosion of the 1980s, it was an era unusually gifted with great defensemen. Orr, of course; the greatest of them all, the player who half a century later has not even been approached, whose greatness only grows with time, the player who changed the way defensemen could play but also set a standard none of his gifted successors have approached. But there was Brad Park and Denis Potvin and Larry Robinson, there was the start for Ray Bourque and the end for J. C. Tremblay, there was Börje Salming revolutionizing the game in an entirely different way. Though not a low-scoring era, the 1970s may have been the decade of the blueliner. There were plenty of great defensemen between Eddie Shore and Bobby Orr, of course, but people had forgotten that the first person to touch the puck has every opportunity to be as creative as the last. The influence of European hockey was just arriving, and hadn't had time to influence young players, but the game had already changed, and the ability of the defense to control where the puck went beyond throwing a thundering open-ice hit was being developed and appreciated in new ways.

So let's look at the best NHL defensemen of the 1970s. Not so much the very best, because nobody needs to be told that Bobby Orr or Larry Robinson was good, but the second tier, the guys who just made the Hall of Fame or didn't quite, the mass of elite talent who, in an elite era, influenced the game.

Continue reading

How Good Was Vsevolod Bobrov?

Vsevolod Mikhailovich Bobrov (December 1, 1922 – July 1, 1979) is the official first hockey hero of the Soviet Union, to the extent Soviet hockey went in for anything as bourgeoisie as heroism. The "Big Red Machine," the formless, perfectly-engineered game-winning communist automaton, all wheels and cogs and interchangeable parts cast in the foundries of the Red Army, was one-third real, one-third the team's goal, and one-third a contrast to North American individualism that appeared starker than it was. The men, like Bobrov, were still men: they lived and breathed and often enough partied like hellions, flying through the snow in their Ladas with a quart of vodka in the system and smoking Polish cigarettes, differentiated from Guy Lafleur by haircut and quality of goods. They left enough memories that Bobrov was named to the IIHF Hall of Fame on its founding a quarter-century after his death, was named to the IIHF "All-Time Russia Team" in 2020, and the KHL named one of its divisions after him.

Although a well-known Soviet athlete immediately after the war, Bobrov made his first international impact at the Olympics. The Summer Olympics, to be specific; in addition to hockey and bandy (which is to hockey as Pravda is to truth), Bobrov was an excellent soccer forward and captained the Soviet soccer team at the 1952 Summer Olympics. Bobrov began by scoring the equalizer in a 2-1 extra time preliminary-round win against a decent Bulgarian team lead by influential goalkeeper Apostol Sokolov. But that was nothing: the Soviets faced a good Yugoslav team next in the first round proper. Yugoslavia took a 3-0 lead at halftime; while Bobrov was able to make it 3–1 Yugoslavia got the next two to stake a 5–1 lead and, like Tito taking over Albania, they probably thought it was all over. At 75' Vasili Trofimov scored for the Soviets; Bobrov added his second at 77' to make a game of it, then completed his hat trick on 87'. 5–4. Aleksandr Petrov tied the game in the eighty-ninth of ninety minutes, and the Soviet Union had what match referee Arthur Ellis called "the most honourable draw ever recorded." There were no penalty shootouts in those days, so two days later they played again: Bobrov opened the scoring in the sixth minute, but the Yugoslavs took control after that, winning 3-1 and going on to the silver medal, losing only to Ferenc Puskás's unstoppable Hungarian "Magical Magyars." Ellis said of Bobrov, "he, almost single-handed, took the score to 5–5 [. . .] For once, use of the word sensational was justified."

This, it will be remembered, was Bobrov's second-best sport.

Continue reading

How Good Was the WHA: The Blueliners

It is unfair, and possibly actionable, to accuse me of quietly stealing article ideas from Twitter replies. Oh, no, I loudly and exuberantly steal ideas from Twitter replies; I dive on them with the frenzy of a pitbull given a steak. So when Andrew Cunningham replied to my first post on the WHA's superstars suggesting that J. C. Tremblay was not really regarded as the WHA's best defenseman at all, I at once saw "content."

My opinion didn't come from nowhere: Tremblay held the points record at the position and won two best-defenseman awards. But Mr. Cunningham suggested Barry Long, Kevin Morrison, Paul Shmyr, and Lars-Erik Sjöberg were better-regarded in their day than Tremblay. Sjöberg and Shmyr were each named defender of the year once, Long and Morrison were not. Tremblay and Morrison were at their best in the WHA's earlier seasons; Sjöberg arrived and (apart from one fluke) Long peaked later, and Shmyr was outstanding throughout. Shmyr and Long had decent NHL careers apart from their WHA accomplishments, Tremblay was of course an All-Star, and Morrison and Sjöberg were in the NHL very briefly. Moreover, though Shmyr and Sjöberg were familiar names, Morrison I knew only from a few stories and Long not at all. They were all serious blueliners in the league and anybody who is quoting World Hockey Association facts from personal memory is a jewel to be cherished in 2026; I certainly couldn't say he is right or wrong.

After all, such personal memories are the stuff history is made of. Statistics are great to fill in the gaps, but they don't nearly tell everything. The World Hockey Association was, as we have now thoroughly established, major league hockey; yet it is major league hockey which is fading from memory without actually being nearly gone. Grabbing these stray 140-character thoughts, filling them with data, and transforming that into perspective is one of the great joys of life.

Continue reading